Most writers depend upon feedback from good readers to improve their work, and learn from reading and commenting upon other author's texts. We encourage these habits and skills at PLU, and ask you to "Peer Review" review and critique each other's work, especially in draft form in many classes.
Incident-Based or Safe Harbor Peer review is the evaluation of nursing services, the qualifications of a nurse, the quality of patient care rendered by nurses, the merits of a complaint concerning a nurse or nursing care, and a determination or recommendation regarding a complaint including: It is a committee established under the authority of the governing body of a national, state, or local nursing association; a school of nursing; the nursing staff of a hospital, health science center, nursing home, home health agency, temporary nursing service, or other health care facility; or state agency or political subdivision for the purpose of conducting nursing peer review.
The nursing peer review process is one of fact-finding, analysis, and study of events by nurses in a climate of collegial problem solving focused on obtaining all relevant information about an event.
There are two kinds of nursing peer review: Invoking safe harbor in accordance with Rule Any patient or client information shall be identified by initials or number to protect confidentiality, but the nurse shall be provided the name of the patient. An employer may take disciplinary action before review by the peer review committee is conducted, as peer review cannot determine issues related to employment.
The role of peer review is to determine if licensure violations have occurred and, if so, if the violations require reporting to the board.
If a report to the BON is already required under Duty to report by employer [Section Writing a peer review example the nursing peer review committee is reviewing the incident solely to determine existence of external factors, due process rights of incident-based peer review do not apply.
Recommendations by IBPR Committee be followed by the employer The nursing peer review committee does not have authority to make employment or disciplinary decisions. The purpose of the Minor Incident Rule is to provide guidance in evaluating whether nursing practice breakdown is subject to mandatory reporting requirements.
With that said, the Minor Incident Rule does not aim to prevent reporting potential violations directly to the Board or to a nursing peer review committee NPRC. The following cannot be considered a minor incident: If remediation will address the deficit sa remediation plan must be developed to address the deficit s.
If remediation will not address the deficit sthen the error cannot be considered a minor incident and the nurse must be reported to the nursing peer review committee or, in practice settings with no nursing peer review, to the Board.
If the determination is that the nurse could be remediated but the nurse does not complete the required remediation, then the nurse must be reported to a nursing peer review committee or the Board. If such factors are found, a report must be made to the patient safety committee, or if the facility does not have a patient safety committee, to the chief nursing officer.
If remediation will not address the deficit sthen the error cannot be considered a minor incident and must be reported to the nursing peer review committee or to the Board if there is not a nursing peer review in the practice setting.
Multiple Incidents [Board Rule In practice settings with nursing peer review, the nurse must be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five minor incidents within a month period. In practice settings with no nursing peer review, the nurse who commits five minor incidents within a month period must be reported directly to the Board.
A report must be prepared, monitored, and maintained for a minimum of 12 months that contains: The nursing peer review committee that receives a report must investigate and conduct incident-based nursing peer review in compliance with Texas Occupations Code Chapter Nursing Peer Review Law and Board Rule If there is no evidence of nursing practice violations, a nurse may be reported to either the BON or to a peer assistance program [Rule The BON will determine in such cases whether or not the nurse is eligible to take part in a peer assistance program.
The IBPR committee may need to re-convene for the sole purpose of determining whether or not external factors contributed to the incident s that lead to peer review. For purposes of exchange of information, the Peer Review committee reviewing the conduct is considered as established under the authority of both so that confidentiality requirements of peer review are enforceable against any nurse involved in the investigation or peer review proceeding.
The two entities may choose to have a contract with respect to which entity will conduct Peer Review of the nurse. When properly invoked, safe harbor protects a nurse from employer retaliation and from licensure sanction by the BON.
Safe Harbor must be invoked prior to engaging in the conduct or assignment for which peer review is requested, and may be invoked at any time during the work period when the initial assignment changes. The latter is an example of a situation where a prudent nurse would refuse to engage in the conduct requested.
There is now a separate form on the BON web page that can be used for this process. Invocation of Safe Harbor protections [ Rule At the time the nurse is requested to engage in the activity, notify the supervisor making the assignment in writing that the nurse is invoking Safe Harbor.An example of this is the fanfared creation a few years ago of the Arts and Humanities Research Council’s “Peer Review College”: a publicly identified body of about 1, individuals who referee applications for AHRC funding and from whom the research council’s .
The body of your review varies according to the type of article and your instructor's requirements. You may have to include the intended audience, the research question, methodology, results, implications and your own assessment of how it relates to what you are studying.
You should have two sheets of paper to write your answers on. One you will keep, the other you will give to your peer review partner. On the sheet you keep, write suggestions for improving your own paper.
Proofreading. Proofreading means examining your text carefully to find and correct typographical errors and mistakes in grammar, style, and spelling. Before any peer review session, I try to model what it should look like in front of the class. I'll either use a sample from another class, or I'll ask for a volunteer from the current class.
The first thing I . Peer review is a standing tradition for the validation of scholarly work. Nursing journals that utilize peer review need expert reviewers to provide feedback to the editors to make publication decisions.