In Oregon, we have the option of sentencing convicted murderers to life in prison without the possibility of parole. There are currently over people in Oregon who have received this sentence. The death penalty puts innocent lives at risk.
Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed? Retribution, in the form of capital punishment is the execution of the criminal in vengeance for the victim and their families.
To kill the person who has killed someone close to you is simply to continue the cycle of violence which ultimately destroys the avenger as well as the offender.
Just as expressing anger simply makes us more angry. It does not drain away. It contaminates the otherwise good will which any human being needs to progress in love and understanding.
Retribution will not avenge the victim that has suffered. It only repeats the cycle in which had been familiarized by the murderer. It is unethical to kill a man for killing another and very contradictory.
The legal system should not use this inhumane act of punishment on criminals for they are repeating the cycle of murder that they are apparently very against. Furthermore another valid motive against capital punishment is the irrevocable mistakes which leave innocent people executed for crimes they did not commit.
Capital punishment is especially inhumane to the civilians who did not commit the crimes they are accused of and have to see the consequence of death. In many cases, it is very easy to be wrongly accused based on inaccurate evidence and this in itself should be enough to ban capital punishment in all of society.
US Senator Russ Feingold gives his perception on how the Government has made mistakes when using capital punishment.
That is a demonstrated error rate of 1 innocent person for every 7 persons executed. When the consequences are life and death, we need to demand the same standard for our system of justice as we would for our airlines… It is a central pillar of our criminal justice system that it is better that many guilty people go free than that one innocent should suffer… Let us reflect to ensure that we are being just.
Let us pause to be certain we do not kill a single innocent person. This is really not too much to ask for a civilized society. Such as the case ofthe state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for starting the fire that killed his children.
The Texas Forensic Science Commission determined that the arson testimony that led to his conviction was based on very inaccurate and flawed science.
To this day, wrongly convicted people on death row have been exonerated. Capital juries are dominated by people who favor the death penalty, resulting in them usually voting to convict them. The evidence shown above should be enough for capital punishment to be demolished purely for the fact that no one should have to be executed even for the case of one innocent person wrongly accused to be saved from death row.
In summary the death penalty [capital punishment] should be abolished in all countries.Jun 01, · By doing so, we’re essentially championing the right to life by taking it from others. True—as a whole, we are not murderers, and understandably refuse to be placed in the same category as someone like Ted Bundy.
But to many opponents of the death penalty, even Ted Bundy should have been given life without parole. The death penalty was, briefly, rendered essentially illegal in the United States by the Supreme Court case Furman v. Georgia but was reinstated in with the case Gregg v. Georgia. You can’t use a weapon of mass destruction in the United States and not think that if you succeed, you’re going to face a federal jury and the possibility of the death penalty.
Jun 01, · 5 Arguments For And Against The Death Penalty. FlameHorse June 1, Share Stumble Tweet. Pin 6 +1 Share 1. Shares 1K.
But to many opponents of the death penalty, even Ted Bundy should have been given life without parole. The fact that he murdered at least thirty people—for the mere reason that he . Should the death penalty be allowed? It is a question that has been debated for centuries, and though many states and countries have done away with it, many have not.
Around our country, states without the death penalty have a lower murder rate than neighboring states with the death penalty. There is a better way to help the families of murder victims.
Families of murder victims undergo severe trauma and loss which no one should minimize.